Study Group 1 │ On Writing Timelines of Korean Art: The Keyword
To celebrate the launch of the MMCA Research Lab, an online platform in Korean and English dedicated to sharing knowledge and information about contemporary Korean art, a related forum called "Study Group 1. Timelines and Features of Korean Art" was held at MMCA Seoul on March 29, 2024.
At the Study Group, MMCA's in-house researchers and affiliated scholars regularly present the results of collaborative research on selected themes.
Part I, "Timelines and Features of Korean Art," the Korean Art Timelines produced by the MMCA Research Lab were the main topic, and the session also explored the potential of expanding art history research through chronology.
In Part II, participants shared their views on "Contemporary Art and Feminism," the first "Features (thematic study)" of the MMCA Research Lab, and discussed the development process of feminist art in Korea.
The participants included Cho Soojin, Kang Min-gi, Kim Yisoon, Kwon Heangga, Lim Shan, Shin Chunghoon, and these participants present the keywords of each period derived from their collaborative study of the timeline and connections between their keywords and art trends of each period.
* * *
1945–1953: Independence and “National Art” (Minjok Misul)
Kang Min-gi: The period I covered is the chaotic period after the independence of Korea and the Korean War, which included the process of getting rid of colonial remnants and pro-Japanese issues. The art world was constantly being divided by the ideological confrontation between the left and right. Various genres such as eastern painting, western painting, calligraphy, photography, crafts, commercial art, and industrial art were created and many art groups were founded, even in the provinces. It was a very dynamic and highly motivated time. I realized that anew as I created this timeline.
If you look at the documents from that time you can see that national art is very much in the picture. In fact, it was not like that only in this period but also in the period after that. This period was also the beginning of the dichotomous perception that color painting was the Japanese style, and ink wash painting was national art which led to a stagnation in the field of color painting until the early 1980s.
So when writing the timeline, my task was to think about how we should perceive the historical period and I contemplated a lot about how to reflect the various aspects of this period and how to select the entries of the timeline in a fair way. In the end, I had to focus on art groups rather than individual activities, and when describing art groups, I could only decide on whether to focus on the founding or the formation of the groups after discussing the matter with other researchers.
Next, when I looked at an exhibition, I wanted to clearly include the title, the venue, the date of the exhibition, and the artists involved as objectively as possible.
Also, the artists who participated were very important. I couldn't help but select artists by the degree of their importance and the groups that the artists participated in. This was a time when solo exhibitions increased tremendously. It was hard to deal with individuals in this timeline, so I focused on art groups. So people looking at the timeline might think, "Oh, this was a period that was centered around group exhibitions." So I tried to balance that out in the overview of the period by mentioning some of the more notable solo exhibitions.
1953-1959: The Post-war Formation of Contemporary Art
Kwon Heangga: My part was how art changed from the end of the war to 1959. It was probably the same for everyone else, but I looked at what happened to the system as a whole, what happened to each genre under each system, and what things related to modernity that began to emerge as the core discourse of this period looked like. The main thing in this period is that this is when international exchange began. So the timeline is organized to reveal the aspects of international exchange.
This is not based on my own research. It's a compilation of research that has been done by a lot of researchers. So this is the outcome of the research of the people who did it before me.
If you look at the keywords of this period, you will see the "National Art Exhibition," the "National Academy of Arts," and the "National Museum" all over the timeline. It's because, under the leadership of the state, which took an anti-communist line, the art history of the country began to be described as South Korea-centered art, not art of the Korean Peninsula. So you can see how the South Korean-centered art system was formed during that period through keywords.
Another important thing about this state-led art is that because it was the Cold War system, a lot of international exchanges such as with the Rockefeller Foundation were done as part of cultural aid. So the Rockefeller Foundation supported the National Museum, and in connection with that, the “Korean Plastic Arts Research Institute” and “Korean Handicraft Demonstration Center” were created. And in a larger sense, there were a lot of overseas exchange exhibitions, such as in the "Bando Gallery" and the "American College Student Art Exhibition." So you can see this in the timeline.
What you must see in connection to that is that the U.S. provided a lot of support for craft and printmaking in this period. This part of Korean art history is described as the emergence of Art Informel and the confrontation between the National Art Exhibition's figurative art and abstract art. The thing about this timeline is that it compresses all of the group activities at the beginning.
For example, the most described Art Informel and Hyundae Fine Artists Association in the late '50s, but these were compressed and appear only once. So if you look at the timeline, the center of gravity is greatly reduced. Instead, you can see new things that are emerging like craft and printmaking. So in a way, when you look at our timeline after studying our existing art history, you'll see that prominent things have been omitted, and instead, craft, printmaking, and graphics are being mentioned more.
A lot of new associations were formed during this period, such as the “Modern Watercolor Association,” the “Korean Prints Association” and the “Korean Art Critics Association.” They have come to be because of the question, "How can we push out modernity and establish contemporary art?" So a lot of things like this, especially groups, are included here. So this period as a whole is part of the transition to contemporary art. It continues on to the 1960s. We've mechanically cut it off at 1959, but you should start with this time period and work your way through to the 1960s.
1960–1969: Avant-garde Activities and Development of the Art System
Cho Soojin: I was in charge of the description of the 1960s timeline. The previous researchers summarized the overall content of their timelines and the content of their essays, but I did not do that. I prepared the thoughts I had while writing the timeline, the main points, difficulties, and what I wanted to emphasize in my essay, so I think it'll be a slightly different presentation.
When MMCA published a Korean Art 1900-2020 in 2021, I was in charge of the description of art history in a similar period. If you look at the table of contents at that time, you'll see that each researcher was in charge of one topic. So it was divided per topic such as abstract art, international biennale, or sculpture. Since researchers were writing in categories such as a concept or genre, their perspectives came through quite clearly in their writings.
So when you finish the book, even though it was a compilation of all the existing research it makes you follow the point of view of mainstream art history.
But the advantage of the timeline is that all the information has the same rank in a certain hierarchy. Because it's evenly arranged chronologically, I think it's much more democratic, in a way. Certain years, artists, groups, or tendencies in art are not described as bigger, smaller, wider, narrower, darker, or lighter, but it all becomes very equal information.
So with that information, the advantage of this timeline is that you can take, for example, just the year 1967, and you can put together a collection of events. You can skim through the events that happened in 1967 on your own, and you can pull out new ideas from there. When you think about those things, "Actuel" and "Sinsanghoe" were created in 1962, People usually focus on Actuel, but there was also Sinsanghoe in the same year. We emphasize the "Union Exhibition of Korean Young Artists," but there was the "Exhibition of Gusangjeon" and exhibits of Sinsanghoe's main members.
I realized that by putting them side by side, people could come up with completely new ideas on a decade-by-decade, year-by-year, month-by-month basis. That is why I started by thinking that I want to create an alternative research that goes beyond the movement history, genre, or media-centered perspective.
Until the 1950s, researchers had a hard time because there was an absolute lack of data. After the 1980s, there was a lot of data so it was difficult to decide which information to select. As for the 1960s, there was definitely more data than the 1950s, but there was no plate and the English translations were not accurate because of the circumstances of the time.
The print quality was not very good so you could hardly see it. I had to rely on press releases from the press. Because there was no specialized art press, most were short articles, and the reporters interpreted them arbitrarily. There were many things like that, so it was difficult to make the timeline.
The previous researchers did a lot of research, so there are a lot of research works from the 1960s, but since it went on for a long time, there were cases where they didn't match each other, so when there were some errors or differences in the information in each person's research, I had to find the original text and check it again.
These are the things that I encountered when I was writing the 1960s timeline. I took on the 1960s. Things like the avant-garde activities, the founding of groups and associations, and the establishment of institutions, that had continued on from the previous period, are the main events of this period. So I tried to allocate an equal amount of space for art that is featured in mainstream art history and art that is not. Usually, mainstream artists are the ones that are mainly described, but I tried to mention as many artists as possible.
So it's a lot of information, but you can see where an artist is at a certain time in a certain group, and then where they came to be ten years later. You'll be able to see the movement or development of artists or groups. I also tried to equally cover the activities of the Korean Art Critics Association, which started in the late 1950s and continued to develop through the 1960s and 1970s, as well as the activities of other arts, such as photography, architecture, crafts, and design, which were newly entering the field of art as the realm of fine art expanded. Of course, I received a great amount of help from the curators in charge of the museum.
In the essay part, it's a continuation of the 1950s, but in the early 1960s, there were some big national events, so I wanted to see how these events affected the emergence of the avant-garde and the establishment of various regimes that had been happening since the late 1950s. I tried to see how the basic attitude of the avant-garde, which was to resist the regime, and the conditions of Korea at the time, which was to establish a new regime, met and created art in the socio-cultural context of the time.
I wanted to show that these were historical factors that had a very significant impact on the art of today.
1970-1979: Transformation of the Art World and the Growth of “Korean” Art
Kim Yisoon: Let me tell you what I focused on when I made the timeline. When we study art history, we tend to look at it in a monolithic way. So we say the 1970s is the era of Korean modernism or the era of monochromatic painting. But from my experience, I didn't think that was necessarily the case, so I wanted to look closely at that part.
When we talk about Korean modernism, it's very monolithic because most of the artists covered in Korean modernism are men. It's a male-centered art history.
In fact, the big change in the 1970s compared to the 1950s and 1960s is that the art population increases tremendously. The art population does not only refer to artists. I think the 1970s was when a lot of the infrastructure to support art was being built. So I looked at the 1970s with the idea Perhaps we can write an art history that is not artist-centered.
Of course, the main thing I relied on for my timeline was prior research. I referenced a lot of papers that were already published. Where there were discrepancies, I tried to find the primary sources. I looked at art magazines, specialized books, and newspaper articles. I tried to find as many different sources as possible to organize the timeline. With these findings, I wrote my essay. I will summarize what I wrote.
In the 1970s, there were a lot of art-related articles, so in terms of volume, it was more than three times as much as in the 1960s. I think there was a big infrastructure built because Korea became more socially and economically stable and the interest in art and culture grew. The first thing we must note is the fact that institutionalization has been established.
Let's take a look at how institutionalization was established. A leading example is that the National Museum of Modern Art, Korea (now MMCA) opened in 1969 at the Gyeongbokgung Palace Museum. Most of the exhibits at the Gyeongbokgung Palace Museum were rented exhibitions. But starting in 1972, the MMCA became established as an institution that organizes exhibitions rather than just renting out their space. The contextualization work of collecting and researching the history of Korean modern and contemporary art began in earnest in the 1970s.
Next, many galleries opened in the 1970s. 36 galleries opened in Seoul, including Hyundai Hwarang. This is also the time when the Insadong Gallery Street was formed. Three or four galleries opened in Daegu and Busan as well, making it a total of 43 private galleries. These are commercially oriented galleries that buy and sell. Galleries are a huge infrastructure. Through the exhibits organized by the gallery, we can do art research and artist research. It's also the time that critics become active as they start to write in the journals published by the galleries.
We commonly use the terms "Four Masters, Six Masters, Seven Masters" in eastern painting and it was in the 1970s that such terms were formed. Then I focused on women artists. What you are seeing now is "AG." After holding an exhibit in 1971, a dozen of the artists lined up for a photo. If you take a look, you can see just one woman standing fourth from the right. I asked the artist, who was actually there at the time, who this woman was. He said she was the woman who documented the material. So I think this is a clear example of how men were dominating art in the 1970s. The 1970s was a time when women artists organized themselves into a group with "yeoryu" in the name of the group and created a space to do activities.
It wasn't the kind of activities that advocated feminism like in the 1980s, but I think it was a time when women's consciousness was greatly formed. There were non-governmental juried exhibitions too.
You could tell that international exchange was very active. In the 1960s, the ultimate goal was to participate in the Paris Biennale. But in the 1970s, you can see that we are not only participating in such events, but also organizing events like the Print Biennale. As you all know, in the 1970s, we considered Japan as a very important exchange partner. As such, you can see that Japan had a great influence on the formation of Korean monochromatic painting. Needless to say, the quantitative expansion of the art world was tremendous.
The terms we currently use in the field of art such as painting, sculpture, three-dimensional, and projected images were coined in the 1970s, and it was also a time when genre boundaries were being deconstructed.
It doesn't show up as much on the timeline, but it's a time when the first generation of professional art critics really came into their own and shaped the discourse. Until the 1960s, it was mainly artists who were doing the writing, and in 1965, people like Oh Kwang-su and Lee Yil appeared, but I think it was in the 1970s that they really took the lead in shaping the discourse of the art world. The 1970s can be seen as a very notable period for art criticism. Experimentality and avant-garde were the keywords of interest for artists who were active in the 1950s and 1960s, but the 1970s was a period of searching for the true Korean style. We call it "Korean modernism," but we can see that the way they searched for the true Korean style was not limited to modernism, but it actually unfolded in diverse ways. What I realized while organizing the timeline of the 1970s is that we can't just talk about the 1970s in terms of Korean modernism. I hope you'll have many different thoughts as you look at the timeline as well.
1980–1989: Expanding Art Practices and the Narrative of the Times
Lim Shan: I am in charge of the 1980s timeline. Today, I would like to talk about my focus, keywords, and organization. First of all, I'd like to say that this timeline was possible thanks to the efforts of several senior artists who were active in the 1980s, and the efforts of art critics, art historians, and curators in the field who studied the art practices of those senior artists with special affection and interest. I would like to thank them for their efforts.
The timeline of the 1980s sought to confirm that Korean art in the 1980s was a large outward sprawl of practices by a variety of subjects. To name a few: the Ink Wash Painting Movement, the Color Painting Movement Ecological Art, Nam June Paik, Minjung Art, Video Art, Performance Art, Computer Art, Feminist Art, galleries specializing in photography, art magazines, postmodernism, small groups, small collectives, New Generation Art, etc. The 1980s was a decade filled with these new designations and I wanted to document their creative footsteps because I believe they foreshadowed many of the capacities of Korean art that make up the present.
Of course, some of the descriptors mentioned in the timeline, the numbers alone, do not capture the complex and multi-layered nature of the field, and the documentation of fields that have not received much attention in mainstream art discourse, such as crafts, fiber arts and photography, for example, is still incomplete. However, I did not want to lose sight of the many achievements that have been recognized as contributing to the development of Korean art. My timeline is based on published research in the art field to date. I have only included them in the timeline if they have been confirmed by concrete facts and scholarly consensus as to their art historical value. The character of such a selection process means that areas that have not yet been studied may not have found their place in the timeline.
However, the ways and times in which the art of the 1980s can be cited are still open, and I believe that new research may change some of the reconstructions I have attempted in this timeline in the future. I believe that new historical art practices that can fill in the gaps can be documented. Let me briefly discuss the art practices documented in the 1980s timeline by dividing them into a few categories.
First, Minjung Art. Given the weight that the 1980s carries in Korean contemporary society, the history of Korean art in the 1980s has a powerful title: "May Gwangju." With our politics as an aesthetic avant-garde and with the traces of seeking a democratic community spirit, we artists have been doing a lot of research around the term "Minjung Art." The art scene saw the establishment of several organizations at the time, each of which has traces of its first or last exhibition in our timeline.
The impact on art history that each practice has is something that I hope the people here will record in the future. I've been thinking that defining a certain exhibition, a certain artist as this or that can actually limit the specificity of the practice, so if the timeline can revitalize that time, I think that's the main role that the timeline should play.
Regarding Minjung Art, I received a lot of help from several major research results. Among them, the result of the project Locus and Focus: Into the 1980s through Art Group Archives conducted at the Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art as part of the 2019 Gyeonggi Art Project was decisive.
I would also like to talk about nature art, ecological art, and nature installations. In the 1980s, the field of nature art expression was created on the white sandy beaches of the Geumgang River in Gongju, Chungcheongnam-do, along the Bukhangang River in Gapyeong, Gyeonggi-do, and along the Nakdong River in Daegu. I saw the movement of the artists at that time, who wanted to restore the full vitality of our bodies and the primal relationship between our bodies and nature, as representative of the ecological concerns and imagination that Korean art possessed. So I recorded the traces of that era and that spirit in the timeline.
The vitality of body art, which continued from the happenings and events of the 1970s, was organized under the name of performance art festivals in the 1980s. That movement produced a number of aesthetic scenes where art, dance, theater, music, and other disciplines converged without genre boundaries. Through senior artists such as Park Hyunki and Kim Youngjin, as well as Shin Jinsik, Yi Wonkon, Yook Keunbyung, and Oh Kyung-hwa, Korean art also created a context for modest but self-sustaining media art. There was also the influence of Nam June Paik, who was working overseas at the time.
As you all know, color television broadcasting began in 1980. Considering the new sense of the age that machines like personal computers, printers, video cameras, and beam projectors showed at the time, I think the media art of the 1980s played a valuable role in bringing out a kind of poetic and artistic sensibility in the public who were experiencing the world of media images, even though it was very simple compared to now. I think it was a solid foundation for the mixed-media experiments that emerged in contemporary Korean art, so I put it in the timeline.
The timeline also reflects some of the forces that drove Korean art in the 1980s: small groups such as TARA, Nanjido, Meta-Vox, Logos & Pathos, and Museum. Often referred to as the Small Group Movement, their activities reflected the zeitgeist in their interpretations and proposals for the concept of art, but they also had autonomous health. In the 1980s, there was also a close collective solidarity of women artists who fought to overcome the challenges of life. We will discuss this separately and in depth today.
Starting with the laborers' struggle in 1987, awareness of the social and structural problems surrounding women's issues deepened, and artists formed groups such as the October Gathering, Teo Dongin, and Dungji to express their socially transformative will through exhibitions, street rallies, strike sites, and publications. In other words, these movements have their own historical status, and I think they continue to expand the meaning of feminist art discourse.
In addition, Korean art in the 1980s erupted with the will for spontaneous and self-generated change, bringing out the language of aspirations that had been silenced until now. For example, within the eastern painting, there was a time of searching for the language of authenticity. In particular, the Ink Wash Painting Movement, the Color Painting Movement or the debate on the nomenclature of Eastern painting and hangukhwa (Korean painting) led to the revitalization of criticism outside of the authoritarian tone of the existing Eastern Painting Group. In doing so, the discourse of Korean painting was able to check itself for its immaturity due to its long-standing adherence to Western logic, and began to possess the internal dynamics necessary to thematize the enormous reality of Korean painting.
This solid practice was accompanied by the establishment of various institutions surrounding art: the Hoam Museum of Art, the Kukje Gallery, the current Art Center Nabi, the former Walker Hill Art Center, and the Calligraphy Art Museum at the Seoul Arts Center, among others, were opened. Art magazines such as Wolgan Misool, Misul Segye, Gana Art, and Wolgan Gongye were founded. This allowed the active expressions generated by the art scene to be documented.
1990-1999: Korean Contemporary Art in Globalization
Shin Chunghoon: I think each period has different challenges. There are periods where a certain narrative is very strong so you have the idea that what's outside of that narrative or what's going to start anew should be actively reflected in the timeline. But in the case of the 1990s, it has the most material, but the question of what to put in the timeline was the problem that the 1990s period took on. So I thought that I could draw a map in a way that would conform to existing discussions but at the same time structuralize the conditions that gave birth to Korean art in the 1990s in a certain way while also preventing it from giving birth to other certain things.
I ended up selecting the spots on the timeline according to that. Overall, I understood the social climate of the 1990s as a period that started with the expectation of "democratization, becoming a developed country, informatization, and globalization," and then ended a little earlier than the physical time due to economic collapse. I also thought that the various collapse accidents in between were a kind of precursor to the flow from expectation to disillusionment. I was trying to weave a story by feeling the atmosphere of expectation, precursor, and the flow of social mood leading to disillusionment, even though it is not directly included in the art historical narrative.
So the first thing that comes up in the 1990s is the keywords that are presented in a lot of papers and articles: terms like "postmodern," "kitsch," and "new generation." Very lighthearted and casual attitude… Art forms like installation, video, and technology that were outside of traditional painting and sculpture… I thought this period was a time when these things were in the spotlight. So I wanted to put group exhibits and events that were associated with that in the timeline. But I thought that there was a context for the emergence of these art forms.
I argued that it was due to the gradual weakening of the two forces that structured Korean art until the 1980s, which were modernism and Minjung Art. Of course, I think it was not unrelated to the weakening of the political, social, and economic background, in other words, the so-called Cold War framework.
On the other hand, I think it is possible to think that the so-called attitude of modernism and Minjung Art did not die out, but rather, as the binding force of modernism and Minjung Art weakened in the 1990s, the question of the fundamental problem progressed on a deeper level. In other words, I have come to understand that in this period, which is called the postmodern era, the two modes of modern art, modernism and realism, were essentially challenged.
From that point of view, with reflective and contextual consciousness of art, I thought that it was necessary to grasp the emergence of installations with a so-called puritanical look the appearance of works that are often called conceptual, and grasp the idea of post-Minjung Art or public art that tried to forge a critical attitude from Minjung Art in changed conditions.
In this way, I came to think that Korean art in the 1990s was organized around three axes: the so-called conceptual art, which was equipped with expert grammar and understanding of the rules of the game of art as a high culture, the sensual art, which had the lightness and provocativeness of the art that was friendly to popular culture, and the critical art, which aimed to renew grassroots culture and which was concerned with art that was related to various social rights from outside. I came to think that I was organizing my work around these three axes.
At the same time, when I diachronically looked at the historical conditions of Korean art before that, I thought that Korean art was moving back and forth between the high culture of modernism and the grassroots culture of Minjung Art and then it was drawn to popular culture in the 1990s, so I got the impression that these three frames were antagonizing each other in the 1990s.
For example, high culture was more pretentious than sophisticated, more autistic than autonomous, so art aligned itself with grassroots culture which was a bastion of authenticity and passion, but in the 1990s, a period that looked like the battlefield has disappeared, the grassroots culture seemed somewhat retrospective and dogmatic, so art was drawn to the exuberance of popular culture which high culture and grassroots culture had denounced as lowbrow and deceptive. Art was drawn to its frankness.
But as the 1990s progressed, the commodity aesthetics of popular culture, which had become unprecedentedly sophisticated due to the advancement of capitalism, seemed sensual and devious, so to regain distance from it, art unfolded in a way that it renewed the criticism and participation of grassroots culture and renewed the depth and reflection of high culture. That's the idea that I came up with.
But this was something that happened within the internal structure of Korean art. When we usually talk about art in the 1990s, we talk about globalization and I think it's an important topic. However, I thought that there were aspects that changed within the internal structure of Korean art as much as that, and that's what I've been talking about until now. This is the period when the conditions of Korean art began to be closely connected to the international conditions of biennalization and globalization of art, and a new group of artists entered international biennales.
During this period, a lot of works appeared with themes such as mobility, nomadism, and migration, so I was thinking about a certain mapping and selection process within these domestic and international conditions, and I thought it would be good to proactively describe the exhibitions or events of art related to them in the timeline.