• January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
  • 1945
  • January, 1945

    January

  • February, 1945

    February

  • March, 1945

    March

  • April, 1945

    April

  • May, 1945

    May

  • June, 1945

    June

  • July, 1945

    July

  • August, 1945

    August

  • September, 1945

    September

  • October, 1945

    October

  • November, 1945

    November

  • December, 1945

    December

  • 1946
  • January, 1946

    January

  • February, 1946

    February

  • March, 1946

    March

  • April, 1946

    April

  • May, 1946

    May

  • June, 1946

    June

  • July, 1946

    July

  • August, 1946

    August

  • September, 1946

    September

  • October, 1946

    October

  • November, 1946

    November

  • December, 1946

    December

  • 1947
  • January, 1947

    January

  • February, 1947

    February

  • March, 1947

    March

  • April, 1947

    April

  • May, 1947

    May

  • June, 1947

    June

  • July, 1947

    July

  • August, 1947

    August

  • September, 1947

    September

  • October, 1947

    October

  • November, 1947

    November

  • December, 1947

    December

  • 1948
  • January, 1948

    January

  • February, 1948

    February

  • March, 1948

    March

  • April, 1948

    April

  • May, 1948

    May

  • June, 1948

    June

  • July, 1948

    July

  • August, 1948

    August

  • September, 1948

    September

  • October, 1948

    October

  • November, 1948

    November

  • December, 1948

    December

  • 1949
  • January, 1949

    January

  • February, 1949

    February

  • March, 1949

    March

  • April, 1949

    April

  • May, 1949

    May

  • June, 1949

    June

  • July, 1949

    July

  • August, 1949

    August

  • September, 1949

    September

  • October, 1949

    October

  • November, 1949

    November

  • December, 1949

    December

  • 1950
  • January, 1950

    January

  • February, 1950

    February

  • March, 1950

    March

  • April, 1950

    April

  • May, 1950

    May

  • June, 1950

    June

  • July, 1950

    July

  • August, 1950

    August

  • September, 1950

    September

  • October, 1950

    October

  • November, 1950

    November

  • December, 1950

    December

  • 1951
  • January, 1951

    January

  • February, 1951

    February

  • March, 1951

    March

  • April, 1951

    April

  • May, 1951

    May

  • June, 1951

    June

  • July, 1951

    July

  • August, 1951

    August

  • September, 1951

    September

  • October, 1951

    October

  • November, 1951

    November

  • December, 1951

    December

  • 1952
  • January, 1952

    January

  • February, 1952

    February

  • March, 1952

    March

  • April, 1952

    April

  • May, 1952

    May

  • June, 1952

    June

  • July, 1952

    July

  • August, 1952

    August

  • September, 1952

    September

  • October, 1952

    October

  • November, 1952

    November

  • December, 1952

    December

  • 1953
  • January, 1953

    January

  • February, 1953

    February

  • March, 1953

    March

  • April, 1953

    April

  • May, 1953

    May

  • June, 1953

    June

  • July, 1953

    July

  • August, 1953

    August

  • September, 1953

    September

  • October, 1953

    October

  • November, 1953

    November

  • December, 1953

    December

  • 1954
  • January, 1954

    January

  • February, 1954

    February

  • March, 1954

    March

  • April, 1954

    April

  • May, 1954

    May

  • June, 1954

    June

  • July, 1954

    July

  • August, 1954

    August

  • September, 1954

    September

  • October, 1954

    October

  • November, 1954

    November

  • December, 1954

    December

  • 1955
  • January, 1955

    January

  • February, 1955

    February

  • March, 1955

    March

  • April, 1955

    April

  • May, 1955

    May

  • June, 1955

    June

  • July, 1955

    July

  • August, 1955

    August

  • September, 1955

    September

  • October, 1955

    October

  • November, 1955

    November

  • December, 1955

    December

  • 1956
  • January, 1956

    January

  • February, 1956

    February

  • March, 1956

    March

  • April, 1956

    April

  • May, 1956

    May

  • June, 1956

    June

  • July, 1956

    July

  • August, 1956

    August

  • September, 1956

    September

  • October, 1956

    October

  • November, 1956

    November

  • December, 1956

    December

  • 1957
  • January, 1957

    January

  • February, 1957

    February

  • March, 1957

    March

  • April, 1957

    April

  • May, 1957

    May

  • June, 1957

    June

  • July, 1957

    July

  • August, 1957

    August

  • September, 1957

    September

  • October, 1957

    October

  • November, 1957

    November

  • December, 1957

    December

  • 1958
  • January, 1958

    January

  • February, 1958

    February

  • March, 1958

    March

  • April, 1958

    April

  • May, 1958

    May

  • June, 1958

    June

  • July, 1958

    July

  • August, 1958

    August

  • September, 1958

    September

  • October, 1958

    October

  • November, 1958

    November

  • December, 1958

    December

  • 1959
  • January, 1959

    January

  • February, 1959

    February

  • March, 1959

    March

  • April, 1959

    April

  • May, 1959

    May

  • June, 1959

    June

  • July, 1959

    July

  • August, 1959

    August

  • September, 1959

    September

  • October, 1959

    October

  • November, 1959

    November

  • December, 1959

    December

  • 1960
  • January, 1960

    January

  • February, 1960

    February

  • March, 1960

    March

  • April, 1960

    April

  • May, 1960

    May

  • June, 1960

    June

  • July, 1960

    July

  • August, 1960

    August

  • September, 1960

    September

  • October, 1960

    October

  • November, 1960

    November

  • December, 1960

    December

  • 1961
  • January, 1961

    January

  • February, 1961

    February

  • March, 1961

    March

  • April, 1961

    April

  • May, 1961

    May

  • June, 1961

    June

  • July, 1961

    July

  • August, 1961

    August

  • September, 1961

    September

  • October, 1961

    October

  • November, 1961

    November

  • December, 1961

    December

  • 1962
  • January, 1962

    January

  • February, 1962

    February

  • March, 1962

    March

  • April, 1962

    April

  • May, 1962

    May

  • June, 1962

    June

  • July, 1962

    July

  • August, 1962

    August

  • September, 1962

    September

  • October, 1962

    October

  • November, 1962

    November

  • December, 1962

    December

  • 1963
  • January, 1963

    January

  • February, 1963

    February

  • March, 1963

    March

  • April, 1963

    April

  • May, 1963

    May

  • June, 1963

    June

  • July, 1963

    July

  • August, 1963

    August

  • September, 1963

    September

  • October, 1963

    October

  • November, 1963

    November

  • December, 1963

    December

  • 1964
  • January, 1964

    January

  • February, 1964

    February

  • March, 1964

    March

  • April, 1964

    April

  • May, 1964

    May

  • June, 1964

    June

  • July, 1964

    July

  • August, 1964

    August

  • September, 1964

    September

  • October, 1964

    October

  • November, 1964

    November

  • December, 1964

    December

  • 1965
  • January, 1965

    January

  • February, 1965

    February

  • March, 1965

    March

  • April, 1965

    April

  • May, 1965

    May

  • June, 1965

    June

  • July, 1965

    July

  • August, 1965

    August

  • September, 1965

    September

  • October, 1965

    October

  • November, 1965

    November

  • December, 1965

    December

  • 1966
  • January, 1966

    January

  • February, 1966

    February

  • March, 1966

    March

  • April, 1966

    April

  • May, 1966

    May

  • June, 1966

    June

  • July, 1966

    July

  • August, 1966

    August

  • September, 1966

    September

  • October, 1966

    October

  • November, 1966

    November

  • December, 1966

    December

  • 1967
  • January, 1967

    January

  • February, 1967

    February

  • March, 1967

    March

  • April, 1967

    April

  • May, 1967

    May

  • June, 1967

    June

  • July, 1967

    July

  • August, 1967

    August

  • September, 1967

    September

  • October, 1967

    October

  • November, 1967

    November

  • December, 1967

    December

  • 1968
  • January, 1968

    January

  • February, 1968

    February

  • March, 1968

    March

  • April, 1968

    April

  • May, 1968

    May

  • June, 1968

    June

  • July, 1968

    July

  • August, 1968

    August

  • September, 1968

    September

  • October, 1968

    October

  • November, 1968

    November

  • December, 1968

    December

  • 1969
  • January, 1969

    January

  • February, 1969

    February

  • March, 1969

    March

  • April, 1969

    April

  • May, 1969

    May

  • June, 1969

    June

  • July, 1969

    July

  • August, 1969

    August

  • September, 1969

    September

  • October, 1969

    October

  • November, 1969

    November

  • December, 1969

    December

  • 1970
  • January, 1970

    January

  • February, 1970

    February

  • March, 1970

    March

  • April, 1970

    April

  • May, 1970

    May

  • June, 1970

    June

  • July, 1970

    July

  • August, 1970

    August

  • September, 1970

    September

  • October, 1970

    October

  • November, 1970

    November

  • December, 1970

    December

  • 1971
  • January, 1971

    January

  • February, 1971

    February

  • March, 1971

    March

  • April, 1971

    April

  • May, 1971

    May

  • June, 1971

    June

  • July, 1971

    July

  • August, 1971

    August

  • September, 1971

    September

  • October, 1971

    October

  • November, 1971

    November

  • December, 1971

    December

  • 1972
  • January, 1972

    January

  • February, 1972

    February

  • March, 1972

    March

  • April, 1972

    April

  • May, 1972

    May

  • June, 1972

    June

  • July, 1972

    July

  • August, 1972

    August

  • September, 1972

    September

  • October, 1972

    October

  • November, 1972

    November

  • December, 1972

    December

  • 1973
  • January, 1973

    January

  • February, 1973

    February

  • March, 1973

    March

  • April, 1973

    April

  • May, 1973

    May

  • June, 1973

    June

  • July, 1973

    July

  • August, 1973

    August

  • September, 1973

    September

  • October, 1973

    October

  • November, 1973

    November

  • December, 1973

    December

  • 1974
  • January, 1974

    January

  • February, 1974

    February

  • March, 1974

    March

  • April, 1974

    April

  • May, 1974

    May

  • June, 1974

    June

  • July, 1974

    July

  • August, 1974

    August

  • September, 1974

    September

  • October, 1974

    October

  • November, 1974

    November

  • December, 1974

    December

  • 1975
  • January, 1975

    January

  • February, 1975

    February

  • March, 1975

    March

  • April, 1975

    April

  • May, 1975

    May

  • June, 1975

    June

  • July, 1975

    July

  • August, 1975

    August

  • September, 1975

    September

  • October, 1975

    October

  • November, 1975

    November

  • December, 1975

    December

  • 1976
  • January, 1976

    January

  • February, 1976

    February

  • March, 1976

    March

  • April, 1976

    April

  • May, 1976

    May

  • June, 1976

    June

  • July, 1976

    July

  • August, 1976

    August

  • September, 1976

    September

  • October, 1976

    October

  • November, 1976

    November

  • December, 1976

    December

  • 1977
  • January, 1977

    January

  • February, 1977

    February

  • March, 1977

    March

  • April, 1977

    April

  • May, 1977

    May

  • June, 1977

    June

  • July, 1977

    July

  • August, 1977

    August

  • September, 1977

    September

  • October, 1977

    October

  • November, 1977

    November

  • December, 1977

    December

  • 1978
  • January, 1978

    January

  • February, 1978

    February

  • March, 1978

    March

  • April, 1978

    April

  • May, 1978

    May

  • June, 1978

    June

  • July, 1978

    July

  • August, 1978

    August

  • September, 1978

    September

  • October, 1978

    October

  • November, 1978

    November

  • December, 1978

    December

  • 1979
  • January, 1979

    January

  • February, 1979

    February

  • March, 1979

    March

  • April, 1979

    April

  • May, 1979

    May

  • June, 1979

    June

  • July, 1979

    July

  • August, 1979

    August

  • September, 1979

    September

  • October, 1979

    October

  • November, 1979

    November

  • December, 1979

    December

  • 1980
  • January, 1980

    January

  • February, 1980

    February

  • March, 1980

    March

  • April, 1980

    April

  • May, 1980

    May

  • June, 1980

    June

  • July, 1980

    July

  • August, 1980

    August

  • September, 1980

    September

  • October, 1980

    October

  • November, 1980

    November

  • December, 1980

    December

  • 1981
  • January, 1981

    January

  • February, 1981

    February

  • March, 1981

    March

  • April, 1981

    April

  • May, 1981

    May

  • June, 1981

    June

  • July, 1981

    July

  • August, 1981

    August

  • September, 1981

    September

  • October, 1981

    October

  • November, 1981

    November

  • December, 1981

    December

  • 1982
  • January, 1982

    January

  • February, 1982

    February

  • March, 1982

    March

  • April, 1982

    April

  • May, 1982

    May

  • June, 1982

    June

  • July, 1982

    July

  • August, 1982

    August

  • September, 1982

    September

  • October, 1982

    October

  • November, 1982

    November

  • December, 1982

    December

  • 1983
  • January, 1983

    January

  • February, 1983

    February

  • March, 1983

    March

  • April, 1983

    April

  • May, 1983

    May

  • June, 1983

    June

  • July, 1983

    July

  • August, 1983

    August

  • September, 1983

    September

  • October, 1983

    October

  • November, 1983

    November

  • December, 1983

    December

  • 1984
  • January, 1984

    January

  • February, 1984

    February

  • March, 1984

    March

  • April, 1984

    April

  • May, 1984

    May

  • June, 1984

    June

  • July, 1984

    July

  • August, 1984

    August

  • September, 1984

    September

  • October, 1984

    October

  • November, 1984

    November

  • December, 1984

    December

  • 1985
  • January, 1985

    January

  • February, 1985

    February

  • March, 1985

    March

  • April, 1985

    April

  • May, 1985

    May

  • June, 1985

    June

  • July, 1985

    July

  • August, 1985

    August

  • September, 1985

    September

  • October, 1985

    October

  • November, 1985

    November

  • December, 1985

    December

  • 1986
  • January, 1986

    January

  • February, 1986

    February

  • March, 1986

    March

  • April, 1986

    April

  • May, 1986

    May

  • June, 1986

    June

  • July, 1986

    July

  • August, 1986

    August

  • September, 1986

    September

  • October, 1986

    October

  • November, 1986

    November

  • December, 1986

    December

  • 1987
  • January, 1987

    January

  • February, 1987

    February

  • March, 1987

    March

  • April, 1987

    April

  • May, 1987

    May

  • June, 1987

    June

  • July, 1987

    July

  • August, 1987

    August

  • September, 1987

    September

  • October, 1987

    October

  • November, 1987

    November

  • December, 1987

    December

  • 1988
  • January, 1988

    January

  • February, 1988

    February

  • March, 1988

    March

  • April, 1988

    April

  • May, 1988

    May

  • June, 1988

    June

  • July, 1988

    July

  • August, 1988

    August

  • September, 1988

    September

  • October, 1988

    October

  • November, 1988

    November

  • December, 1988

    December

  • 1989
  • January, 1989

    January

  • February, 1989

    February

  • March, 1989

    March

  • April, 1989

    April

  • May, 1989

    May

  • June, 1989

    June

  • July, 1989

    July

  • August, 1989

    August

  • September, 1989

    September

  • October, 1989

    October

  • November, 1989

    November

  • December, 1989

    December

  • 1990
  • January, 1990

    January

  • February, 1990

    February

  • March, 1990

    March

  • April, 1990

    April

  • May, 1990

    May

  • June, 1990

    June

  • July, 1990

    July

  • August, 1990

    August

  • September, 1990

    September

  • October, 1990

    October

  • November, 1990

    November

  • December, 1990

    December

  • 1991
  • January, 1991

    January

  • February, 1991

    February

  • March, 1991

    March

  • April, 1991

    April

  • May, 1991

    May

  • June, 1991

    June

  • July, 1991

    July

  • August, 1991

    August

  • September, 1991

    September

  • October, 1991

    October

  • November, 1991

    November

  • December, 1991

    December

  • 1992
  • January, 1992

    January

  • February, 1992

    February

  • March, 1992

    March

  • April, 1992

    April

  • May, 1992

    May

  • June, 1992

    June

  • July, 1992

    July

  • August, 1992

    August

  • September, 1992

    September

  • October, 1992

    October

  • November, 1992

    November

  • December, 1992

    December

  • 1993
  • January, 1993

    January

  • February, 1993

    February

  • March, 1993

    March

  • April, 1993

    April

  • May, 1993

    May

  • June, 1993

    June

  • July, 1993

    July

  • August, 1993

    August

  • September, 1993

    September

  • October, 1993

    October

  • November, 1993

    November

  • December, 1993

    December

  • 1994
  • January, 1994

    January

  • February, 1994

    February

  • March, 1994

    March

  • April, 1994

    April

  • May, 1994

    May

  • June, 1994

    June

  • July, 1994

    July

  • August, 1994

    August

  • September, 1994

    September

  • October, 1994

    October

  • November, 1994

    November

  • December, 1994

    December

  • 1995
  • January, 1995

    January

  • February, 1995

    February

  • March, 1995

    March

  • April, 1995

    April

  • May, 1995

    May

  • June, 1995

    June

  • July, 1995

    July

  • August, 1995

    August

  • September, 1995

    September

  • October, 1995

    October

  • November, 1995

    November

  • December, 1995

    December

  • 1996
  • January, 1996

    January

  • February, 1996

    February

  • March, 1996

    March

  • April, 1996

    April

  • May, 1996

    May

  • June, 1996

    June

  • July, 1996

    July

  • August, 1996

    August

  • September, 1996

    September

  • October, 1996

    October

  • November, 1996

    November

  • December, 1996

    December

  • 1997
  • January, 1997

    January

  • February, 1997

    February

  • March, 1997

    March

  • April, 1997

    April

  • May, 1997

    May

  • June, 1997

    June

  • July, 1997

    July

  • August, 1997

    August

  • September, 1997

    September

  • October, 1997

    October

  • November, 1997

    November

  • December, 1997

    December

  • 1998
  • January, 1998

    January

  • February, 1998

    February

  • March, 1998

    March

  • April, 1998

    April

  • May, 1998

    May

  • June, 1998

    June

  • July, 1998

    July

  • August, 1998

    August

  • September, 1998

    September

  • October, 1998

    October

  • November, 1998

    November

  • December, 1998

    December

  • 1999
  • January, 1999

    January

  • February, 1999

    February

  • March, 1999

    March

  • April, 1999

    April

  • May, 1999

    May

  • June, 1999

    June

  • July, 1999

    July

  • August, 1999

    August

  • September, 1999

    September

  • October, 1999

    October

  • November, 1999

    November

  • December, 1999

    December

toggle button for the quick banner area toggle button for the quick banner area

Features

Essays

Essays

Study Group 1 │ On Writing Timelines of Korean Art: The Keyword

To celebrate the launch of the MMCA Research Lab, an online platform in Korean and English dedicated to sharing knowledge and information about contemporary Korean art, a related forum called "Study Group 1. Timelines and Features of Korean Art" was held at MMCA Seoul on March 29, 2024.
At the Study Group, MMCA's in-house researchers and affiliated scholars regularly present the results of collaborative research on selected themes.

Part I, "Timelines and Features of Korean Art," the Korean Art Timelines produced by the MMCA Research Lab were the main topic, and the session also explored the potential of expanding art history research through chronology.
In Part II, participants shared their views on "Contemporary Art and Feminism," the first "Features (thematic study)" of the MMCA Research Lab, and discussed the development process of feminist art in Korea.

The participants included Cho Soojin, Kang Min-gi, Kim Yisoon, Kwon Heangga, Lim Shan, Shin Chunghoon, and these participants present the keywords of each period derived from their collaborative study of the timeline and connections between their keywords and art trends of each period.

 

 * * *
 
1945–1953: Independence and “National Art” (Minjok Misul)
 
Kang Min-gi: The period I covered is the chaotic period after the independence of Korea and the Korean War, which included the process of getting rid of colonial remnants and pro-Japanese issues. The art world was constantly being divided by the ideological confrontation between the left and right. Various genres such as eastern painting, western painting, calligraphy, photography, crafts, commercial art, and industrial art were created and many art groups were founded, even in the provinces. It was a very dynamic and highly motivated time. I realized that anew as I created this timeline.
If you look at the documents from that time you can see that national art is very much in the picture. In fact, it was not like that only in this period but also in the period after that. This period was also the beginning of the dichotomous perception that color painting was the Japanese style, and ink wash painting was national art which led to a stagnation in the field of color painting until the early 1980s.

So when writing the timeline, my task was to think about how we should perceive the historical period and I contemplated a lot about how to reflect the various aspects of this period and how to select the entries of the timeline in a fair way. In the end, I had to focus on art groups rather than individual activities, and when describing art groups, I could only decide on whether to focus on the founding or the formation of the groups after discussing the matter with other researchers.

Next, when I looked at an exhibition, I wanted to clearly include the title, the venue, the date of the exhibition, and the artists involved as objectively as possible. 

Also, the artists who participated were very important. I couldn't help but select artists by the degree of their importance and the groups that the artists participated in. This was a time when solo exhibitions increased tremendously. It was hard to deal with individuals in this timeline, so I focused on art groups. So people looking at the timeline might think, "Oh, this was a period that was centered around group exhibitions." So I tried to balance that out in the overview of the period by mentioning some of the more notable solo exhibitions. 

 
1953-1959: The Post-war Formation of Contemporary Art
 
Kwon Heangga: My part was how art changed from the end of the war to 1959. It was probably the same for everyone else, but I looked at what happened to the system as a whole, what happened to each genre under each system, and what things related to modernity that began to emerge as the core discourse of this period looked like. The main thing in this period is that this is when international exchange began. So the timeline is organized to reveal the aspects of international exchange.
This is not based on my own research. It's a compilation of research that has been done by a lot of researchers. So this is the outcome of the research of the people who did it before me. 

If you look at the keywords of this period, you will see the "National Art Exhibition," the "National Academy of Arts," and the "National Museum" all over the timeline. It's because, under the leadership of the state, which took an anti-communist line, the art history of the country began to be described as South Korea-centered art, not art of the Korean Peninsula. So you can see how the South Korean-centered art system was formed during that period through keywords.

Another important thing about this state-led art is that because it was the Cold War system, a lot of international exchanges such as with the Rockefeller Foundation were done as part of cultural aid. So the Rockefeller Foundation supported the National Museum, and in connection with that, the “Korean Plastic Arts Research Institute” and “Korean Handicraft Demonstration Center” were created. And in a larger sense, there were a lot of overseas exchange exhibitions, such as in the "Bando Gallery" and the "American College Student Art Exhibition." So you can see this in the timeline. 

What you must see in connection to that is that the U.S. provided a lot of support for craft and printmaking in this period. This part of Korean art history is described as the emergence of Art Informel and the confrontation between the National Art Exhibition's figurative art and abstract art. The thing about this timeline is that it compresses all of the group activities at the beginning. 

For example, the most described Art Informel and Hyundae Fine Artists Association in the late '50s, but these were compressed and appear only once. So if you look at the timeline, the center of gravity is greatly reduced. Instead, you can see new things that are emerging like craft and printmaking. So in a way, when you look at our timeline after studying our existing art history, you'll see that prominent things have been omitted, and instead, craft, printmaking, and graphics are being mentioned more.

A lot of new associations were formed during this period, such as the “Modern Watercolor Association,” the “Korean Prints Association” and the “Korean Art Critics Association.” They have come to be because of the question, "How can we push out modernity and establish contemporary art?" So a lot of things like this, especially groups, are included here. So this period as a whole is part of the transition to contemporary art. It continues on to the 1960s. We've mechanically cut it off at 1959, but you should start with this time period and work your way through to the 1960s. 

 
1960–1969: Avant-garde Activities and Development of the Art System
 
Cho Soojin: I was in charge of the description of the 1960s timeline. The previous researchers summarized the overall content of their timelines and the content of their essays, but I did not do that. I prepared the thoughts I had while writing the timeline, the main points, difficulties, and what I wanted to emphasize in my essay, so I think it'll be a slightly different presentation.

When MMCA published a Korean Art 1900-2020 in 2021, I was in charge of the description of art history in a similar period. If you look at the table of contents at that time, you'll see that each researcher was in charge of one topic. So it was divided per topic such as abstract art, international biennale, or sculpture. Since researchers were writing in categories such as a concept or genre, their perspectives came through quite clearly in their writings.
So when you finish the book, even though it was a compilation of all the existing research it makes you follow the point of view of mainstream art history.

But the advantage of the timeline is that all the information has the same rank in a certain hierarchy. Because it's evenly arranged chronologically, I think it's much more democratic, in a way. Certain years, artists, groups, or tendencies in art are not described as bigger, smaller, wider, narrower, darker, or lighter, but it all becomes very equal information. 

So with that information, the advantage of this timeline is that you can take, for example, just the year 1967, and you can put together a collection of events. You can skim through the events that happened in 1967 on your own, and you can pull out new ideas from there. When you think about those things, "Actuel" and "Sinsanghoe" were created in 1962, People usually focus on Actuel, but there was also Sinsanghoe in the same year. We emphasize the "Union Exhibition of Korean Young Artists," but there was the "Exhibition of Gusangjeon" and exhibits of Sinsanghoe's main members.

I realized that by putting them side by side, people could come up with completely new ideas on a decade-by-decade, year-by-year, month-by-month basis. That is why I started by thinking that I want to create an alternative research that goes beyond the movement history, genre, or media-centered perspective. 

Until the 1950s, researchers had a hard time because there was an absolute lack of data. After the 1980s, there was a lot of data so it was difficult to decide which information to select. As for the 1960s, there was definitely more data than the 1950s, but there was no plate and the English translations were not accurate because of the circumstances of the time.
The print quality was not very good so you could hardly see it. I had to rely on press releases from the press. Because there was no specialized art press, most were short articles, and the reporters interpreted them arbitrarily. There were many things like that, so it was difficult to make the timeline.

The previous researchers did a lot of research, so there are a lot of research works from the 1960s, but since it went on for a long time, there were cases where they didn't match each other, so when there were some errors or differences in the information in each person's research, I had to find the original text and check it again.

These are the things that I encountered when I was writing the 1960s timeline. I took on the 1960s. Things like the avant-garde activities, the founding of groups and associations, and the establishment of institutions, that had continued on from the previous period, are the main events of this period. So I tried to allocate an equal amount of space for art that is featured in mainstream art history and art that is not. Usually, mainstream artists are the ones that are mainly described, but I tried to mention as many artists as possible.

So it's a lot of information, but you can see where an artist is at a certain time in a certain group, and then where they came to be ten years later. You'll be able to see the movement or development of artists or groups. I also tried to equally cover the activities of the Korean Art Critics Association, which started in the late 1950s and continued to develop through the 1960s and 1970s, as well as the activities of other arts, such as photography, architecture, crafts, and design, which were newly entering the field of art as the realm of fine art expanded. Of course, I received a great amount of help from the curators in charge of the museum.

In the essay part, it's a continuation of the 1950s, but in the early 1960s, there were some big national events, so I wanted to see how these events affected the emergence of the avant-garde and the establishment of various regimes that had been happening since the late 1950s. I tried to see how the basic attitude of the avant-garde, which was to resist the regime, and the conditions of Korea at the time, which was to establish a new regime, met and created art in the socio-cultural context of the time.
I wanted to show that these were historical factors that had a very significant impact on the art of today. 

 
1970-1979: Transformation of the Art World and the Growth of “Korean” Art
 
Kim Yisoon: Let me tell you what I focused on when I made the timeline. When we study art history, we tend to look at it in a monolithic way. So we say the 1970s is the era of Korean modernism or the era of monochromatic painting. But from my experience, I didn't think that was necessarily the case, so I wanted to look closely at that part.
When we talk about Korean modernism, it's very monolithic because most of the artists covered in Korean modernism are men. It's a male-centered art history. 

In fact, the big change in the 1970s compared to the 1950s and 1960s is that the art population increases tremendously. The art population does not only refer to artists. I think the 1970s was when a lot of the infrastructure to support art was being built. So I looked at the 1970s with the idea Perhaps we can write an art history that is not artist-centered.
Of course, the main thing I relied on for my timeline was prior research. I referenced a lot of papers that were already published. Where there were discrepancies, I tried to find the primary sources. I looked at art magazines, specialized books, and newspaper articles. I tried to find as many different sources as possible to organize the timeline. With these findings, I wrote my essay. I will summarize what I wrote. 

In the 1970s, there were a lot of art-related articles, so in terms of volume, it was more than three times as much as in the 1960s. I think there was a big infrastructure built because Korea became more socially and economically stable and the interest in art and culture grew. The first thing we must note is the fact that institutionalization has been established.
Let's take a look at how institutionalization was established. A leading example is that the National Museum of Modern Art, Korea (now MMCA) opened in 1969 at the Gyeongbokgung Palace Museum. Most of the exhibits at the Gyeongbokgung Palace Museum were rented exhibitions. But starting in 1972, the MMCA became established as an institution that organizes exhibitions rather than just renting out their space. The contextualization work of collecting and researching the history of Korean modern and contemporary art began in earnest in the 1970s. 

Next, many galleries opened in the 1970s. 36 galleries opened in Seoul, including Hyundai Hwarang. This is also the time when the Insadong Gallery Street was formed. Three or four galleries opened in Daegu and Busan as well, making it a total of 43 private galleries. These are commercially oriented galleries that buy and sell. Galleries are a huge infrastructure. Through the exhibits organized by the gallery, we can do art research and artist research. It's also the time that critics become active as they start to write in the journals published by the galleries.

We commonly use the terms "Four Masters, Six Masters, Seven Masters" in eastern painting and it was in the 1970s that such terms were formed. Then I focused on women artists. What you are seeing now is "AG." After holding an exhibit in 1971, a dozen of the artists lined up for a photo. If you take a look, you can see just one woman standing fourth from the right. I asked the artist, who was actually there at the time, who this woman was. He said she was the woman who documented the material. So I think this is a clear example of how men were dominating art in the 1970s. The 1970s was a time when women artists organized themselves into a group with "yeoryu" in the name of the group and created a space to do activities.
It wasn't the kind of activities that advocated feminism like in the 1980s, but I think it was a time when women's consciousness was greatly formed. There were non-governmental juried exhibitions too.

You could tell that international exchange was very active. In the 1960s, the ultimate goal was to participate in the Paris Biennale. But in the 1970s, you can see that we are not only participating in such events, but also organizing events like the Print Biennale. As you all know, in the 1970s, we considered Japan as a very important exchange partner. As such, you can see that Japan had a great influence on the formation of Korean monochromatic painting. Needless to say, the quantitative expansion of the art world was tremendous.
The terms we currently use in the field of art such as painting, sculpture, three-dimensional, and projected images were coined in the 1970s, and it was also a time when genre boundaries were being deconstructed. 

It doesn't show up as much on the timeline, but it's a time when the first generation of professional art critics really came into their own and shaped the discourse. Until the 1960s, it was mainly artists who were doing the writing, and in 1965, people like Oh Kwang-su and Lee Yil appeared, but I think it was in the 1970s that they really took the lead in shaping the discourse of the art world. The 1970s can be seen as a very notable period for art criticism. Experimentality and avant-garde were the keywords of interest for artists who were active in the 1950s and 1960s, but the 1970s was a period of searching for the true Korean style. We call it "Korean modernism," but we can see that the way they searched for the true Korean style was not limited to modernism, but it actually unfolded in diverse ways. What I realized while organizing the timeline of the 1970s is that we can't just talk about the 1970s in terms of Korean modernism. I hope you'll have many different thoughts as you look at the timeline as well. 

 
1980–1989: Expanding Art Practices and the Narrative of the Times
 
Lim Shan: I am in charge of the 1980s timeline. Today, I would like to talk about my focus, keywords, and organization. First of all, I'd like to say that this timeline was possible thanks to the efforts of several senior artists who were active in the 1980s, and the efforts of art critics, art historians, and curators in the field who studied the art practices of those senior artists with special affection and interest. I would like to thank them for their efforts. 

The timeline of the 1980s sought to confirm that Korean art in the 1980s was a large outward sprawl of practices by a variety of subjects. To name a few: the Ink Wash Painting Movement, the Color Painting Movement Ecological Art, Nam June Paik, Minjung Art, Video Art, Performance Art, Computer Art, Feminist Art, galleries specializing in photography, art magazines, postmodernism, small groups, small collectives, New Generation Art, etc. The 1980s was a decade filled with these new designations and I wanted to document their creative footsteps because I believe they foreshadowed many of the capacities of Korean art that make up the present.

Of course, some of the descriptors mentioned in the timeline, the numbers alone, do not capture the complex and multi-layered nature of the field, and the documentation of fields that have not received much attention in mainstream art discourse, such as crafts, fiber arts and photography, for example, is still incomplete. However, I did not want to lose sight of the many achievements that have been recognized as contributing to the development of Korean art. My timeline is based on published research in the art field to date. I have only included them in the timeline if they have been confirmed by concrete facts and scholarly consensus as to their art historical value. The character of such a selection process means that areas that have not yet been studied may not have found their place in the timeline.

However, the ways and times in which the art of the 1980s can be cited are still open, and I believe that new research may change some of the reconstructions I have attempted in this timeline in the future. I believe that new historical art practices that can fill in the gaps can be documented. Let me briefly discuss the art practices documented in the 1980s timeline by dividing them into a few categories. 

First, Minjung Art. Given the weight that the 1980s carries in Korean contemporary society, the history of Korean art in the 1980s has a powerful title: "May Gwangju." With our politics as an aesthetic avant-garde and with the traces of seeking a democratic community spirit, we artists have been doing a lot of research around the term "Minjung Art." The art scene saw the establishment of several organizations at the time, each of which has traces of its first or last exhibition in our timeline.
The impact on art history that each practice has is something that I hope the people here will record in the future. I've been thinking that defining a certain exhibition, a certain artist as this or that can actually limit the specificity of the practice, so if the timeline can revitalize that time, I think that's the main role that the timeline should play. 

Regarding Minjung Art, I received a lot of help from several major research results. Among them, the result of the project Locus and Focus: Into the 1980s through Art Group Archives conducted at the Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art as part of the 2019 Gyeonggi Art Project was decisive. 
I would also like to talk about nature art, ecological art, and nature installations. In the 1980s, the field of nature art expression was created on the white sandy beaches of the Geumgang River in Gongju, Chungcheongnam-do, along the Bukhangang River in Gapyeong, Gyeonggi-do, and along the Nakdong River in Daegu. I saw the movement of the artists at that time, who wanted to restore the full vitality of our bodies and the primal relationship between our bodies and nature, as representative of the ecological concerns and imagination that Korean art possessed. So I recorded the traces of that era and that spirit in the timeline. 

The vitality of body art, which continued from the happenings and events of the 1970s, was organized under the name of performance art festivals in the 1980s. That movement produced a number of aesthetic scenes where art, dance, theater, music, and other disciplines converged without genre boundaries. Through senior artists such as Park Hyunki and Kim Youngjin, as well as Shin Jinsik, Yi Wonkon, Yook Keunbyung, and Oh Kyung-hwa, Korean art also created a context for modest but self-sustaining media art. There was also the influence of Nam June Paik, who was working overseas at the time.
As you all know, color television broadcasting began in 1980. Considering the new sense of the age that machines like personal computers, printers, video cameras, and beam projectors showed at the time, I think the media art of the 1980s played a valuable role in bringing out a kind of poetic and artistic sensibility in the public who were experiencing the world of media images, even though it was very simple compared to now. I think it was a solid foundation for the mixed-media experiments that emerged in contemporary Korean art, so I put it in the timeline. 

The timeline also reflects some of the forces that drove Korean art in the 1980s: small groups such as TARA, Nanjido, Meta-Vox, Logos & Pathos, and Museum. Often referred to as the Small Group Movement, their activities reflected the zeitgeist in their interpretations and proposals for the concept of art, but they also had autonomous health. In the 1980s, there was also a close collective solidarity of women artists who fought to overcome the challenges of life. We will discuss this separately and in depth today.
Starting with the laborers' struggle in 1987, awareness of the social and structural problems surrounding women's issues deepened, and artists formed groups such as the October Gathering, Teo Dongin, and Dungji to express their socially transformative will through exhibitions, street rallies, strike sites, and publications. In other words, these movements have their own historical status, and I think they continue to expand the meaning of feminist art discourse. 

In addition, Korean art in the 1980s erupted with the will for spontaneous and self-generated change, bringing out the language of aspirations that had been silenced until now. For example, within the eastern painting, there was a time of searching for the language of authenticity. In particular, the Ink Wash Painting Movement, the Color Painting Movement or the debate on the nomenclature of Eastern painting and hangukhwa (Korean painting) led to the revitalization of criticism outside of the authoritarian tone of the existing Eastern Painting Group. In doing so, the discourse of Korean painting was able to check itself for its immaturity due to its long-standing adherence to Western logic, and began to possess the internal dynamics necessary to thematize the enormous reality of Korean painting. 

This solid practice was accompanied by the establishment of various institutions surrounding art: the Hoam Museum of Art, the Kukje Gallery, the current Art Center Nabi, the former Walker Hill Art Center, and the Calligraphy Art Museum at the Seoul Arts Center, among others, were opened. Art magazines such as Wolgan Misool, Misul Segye, Gana Art, and Wolgan Gongye were founded. This allowed the active expressions generated by the art scene to be documented. 

 
1990-1999: Korean Contemporary Art in Globalization
 
Shin Chunghoon: I think each period has different challenges. There are periods where a certain narrative is very strong so you have the idea that what's outside of that narrative or what's going to start anew should be actively reflected in the timeline. But in the case of the 1990s, it has the most material, but the question of what to put in the timeline was the problem that the 1990s period took on. So I thought that I could draw a map in a way that would conform to existing discussions but at the same time structuralize the conditions that gave birth to Korean art in the 1990s in a certain way while also preventing it from giving birth to other certain things. 

I ended up selecting the spots on the timeline according to that. Overall, I understood the social climate of the 1990s as a period that started with the expectation of "democratization, becoming a developed country, informatization, and globalization," and then ended a little earlier than the physical time due to economic collapse. I also thought that the various collapse accidents in between were a kind of precursor to the flow from expectation to disillusionment. I was trying to weave a story by feeling the atmosphere of expectation, precursor, and the flow of social mood leading to disillusionment, even though it is not directly included in the art historical narrative. 

So the first thing that comes up in the 1990s is the keywords that are presented in a lot of papers and articles: terms like "postmodern," "kitsch," and "new generation." Very lighthearted and casual attitude… Art forms like installation, video, and technology that were outside of traditional painting and sculpture… I thought this period was a time when these things were in the spotlight. So I wanted to put group exhibits and events that were associated with that in the timeline. But I thought that there was a context for the emergence of these art forms.
I argued that it was due to the gradual weakening of the two forces that structured Korean art until the 1980s, which were modernism and Minjung Art. Of course, I think it was not unrelated to the weakening of the political, social, and economic background, in other words, the so-called Cold War framework. 

On the other hand, I think it is possible to think that the so-called attitude of modernism and Minjung Art did not die out, but rather, as the binding force of modernism and Minjung Art weakened in the 1990s, the question of the fundamental problem progressed on a deeper level. In other words, I have come to understand that in this period, which is called the postmodern era, the two modes of modern art, modernism and realism, were essentially challenged.
From that point of view, with reflective and contextual consciousness of art, I thought that it was necessary to grasp the emergence of installations with a so-called puritanical look the appearance of works that are often called conceptual, and grasp the idea of post-Minjung Art or public art that tried to forge a critical attitude from Minjung Art in changed conditions. 

In this way, I came to think that Korean art in the 1990s was organized around three axes: the so-called conceptual art, which was equipped with expert grammar and understanding of the rules of the game of art as a high culture, the sensual art, which had the lightness and provocativeness of the art that was friendly to popular culture, and the critical art, which aimed to renew grassroots culture and which was concerned with art that was related to various social rights from outside. I came to think that I was organizing my work around these three axes.
At the same time, when I diachronically looked at the historical conditions of Korean art before that, I thought that Korean art was moving back and forth between the high culture of modernism and the grassroots culture of Minjung Art and then it was drawn to popular culture in the 1990s, so I got the impression that these three frames were antagonizing each other in the 1990s. 

For example, high culture was more pretentious than sophisticated, more autistic than autonomous, so art aligned itself with grassroots culture which was a bastion of authenticity and passion, but in the 1990s, a period that looked like the battlefield has disappeared, the grassroots culture seemed somewhat retrospective and dogmatic, so art was drawn to the exuberance of popular culture which high culture and grassroots culture had denounced as lowbrow and deceptive. Art was drawn to its frankness. 

But as the 1990s progressed, the commodity aesthetics of popular culture, which had become unprecedentedly sophisticated due to the advancement of capitalism, seemed sensual and devious, so to regain distance from it, art unfolded in a way that it renewed the criticism and participation of grassroots culture and renewed the depth and reflection of high culture. That's the idea that I came up with. 

But this was something that happened within the internal structure of Korean art. When we usually talk about art in the 1990s, we talk about globalization and I think it's an important topic. However, I thought that there were aspects that changed within the internal structure of Korean art as much as that, and that's what I've been talking about until now. This is the period when the conditions of Korean art began to be closely connected to the international conditions of biennalization and globalization of art, and a new group of artists entered international biennales.
During this period, a lot of works appeared with themes such as mobility, nomadism, and migration, so I was thinking about a certain mapping and selection process within these domestic and international conditions, and I thought it would be good to proactively describe the exhibitions or events of art related to them in the timeline.

Art Terms